SC Rejects Clintons' Race Card - Obama 55%, Clinton(s) 27%

South Carolina last night became the first Southernand I sure hope he got it. Why? Because Obama
state in the presidential primary season to vote, andunderstands, as I and a growing number of my fellow
South Carolinians sent a message to the DemocraticAmericans do, that the Democrats need a new base:
Party: if you want credibility with today's voters, don'ta base guided by the dynamic political center, not the
turn the clock back on racial politics.deluded apologists for outdated liberal assumptions.
The big winner was Barack Obama, garnering 55Democrats at an X-roads
percent of the vote in the Democratic primary. It wasHillary and Bill Clinton have not simply tarnished their
no surprise that Obama inspired 78 percent of blackown, respective images: they have made their joint
voters to side with him. But what was perhaps moregoal VERY CLEAR. They just wanna be president.
notable was the approximately 12 to 14 percentTheir ambition has trumped even the need to preserve
"bump" he got in white voters, whose support hadthe integrity of the Democratic Party in its modern
stood at a paltry 10 percent only days ago thanks tocompact with black voters, wherein Democrats -
the efforts of the Clinton Ambition Machine.thanks, it's true, largely to Lyndon Johnson - had been
Hillary Clinton had gotten the ball rolling by trying tojudged as the party that truly cared about black
not-so-subtly brand Obama as a "black candidate"concerns.
-rather than simply a "candidate" - when she made aThe Clintons showed me how little respect they had
point of noting that Martin Luther King's efforts atfor the dignity of black people as individuals; that, in their
attaining greater equality for blacks in the 1950s andeyes, black folks were just a "voting bloc" the party
early 60s would have been fruitless without (white)needs to keep a hold of, even if it means using political
president Lyndon Johnson. (Why did her commentextortion. Strong language, I know. But what I saw and
have racial undertones? Because she wouldn't haveheard from the Clintons in South Carolina was an
had any material to work with if Johnson had beenattempt to threaten blacks with further marginalization
black.)if they sided with a "black" candidate. It must have
Here's what I heard in Clinton's message: Remember,been one of the saddest moments of truth for legions
black people, you can't get anywhere without whitesof former (Bill) Clinton supporters. People like me.
making it happen for you. As if blacks don't alreadyThe irony is that the Clintons' assumptions about the
know how much sympathy they need from membersprejudices of voters today may turn out to be
of the cultural majority simply to be assured a minimummisplaced. I would not be surprised if their tactics,
of respect from that cultural majority. Hubby andwhich seem to have backfired on them in South
former ex-prez Bill Clinton had already labeledCarolina, continue to undermine Hillary's campaign
Obama's POV on the war a "fairy tale," suggestingheading into Super Tuesday.
that the "black candidate" was naive about international(How disgusted was I with the Clintons? I actually
affairs and therefore nowhere near as sophisticatedcaught myself fantasizing about voting for Mitt
as "people like us."Romney if Clinton were his opponent.)
Bill further tried to pigeonhole Obama as an old-schoolThose in America who want to see the Democrats
liberal leader (read: culturally - or racially -establish a winning game plan need to help move the
one-dimensional) by suggesting that Obama's supportparty toward Obama's more inclusive - and politically
in South Carolina was comparable to Jesse Jackson'srealistic - vision. Whether they realize it or not,
primary victories in the state in 1984 and 1988. ButDemocratic voters are faced with a historic decision:
voters who've been paying attention know thatto stay where they've been, circling their leftist wagons
Obama is a totally different guy than Jackson. He hasand sticking their heads in the sand; or taking the
no interest in playing a "black leader," but rather in beingblinders off, opening their minds and living in the present
an "American leader."and future.
Obama also has no interest in seeing the DemocraticThat present and future could mean victory for a
Party prolong its losing streak vis-a-vis the presidency,rebranded Democratic Party - a party where race is
which is why he has made a point of saying thatbeside the point, because the candidates don't make a
crossover Republicans and Independent voters arepoint of race; where good ideas are welcomed, no
welcome under his tent.matter what part of the political spectrum they come
Hillary Clinton went after Obama at the Democraticfrom; where more "average" citizens help drive the
debate Monday night for praising Ronald Reagan. As Iparty's direction and the "elites" responsible for
watched her try to paint Obama as arepeated failures on the political playing field no longer
"Republican-lover," I thought: How stupid. What I heardcall the shots.
in Obama's comments about Reagan, the appeal ofCandidates who rely on the votes of narrow-minded,
Republican ideas and the Republican Party's challengepolarized, fearful and misguided elements in their midst
of conventional wisdom during the 1980s and 1990swill not do well in a political landscape where the winds
was an appreciation for their STRATEGY - not theirof unity and inclusion are blowing. Democratic voters
POLICIES.must decide whether they will allow themselves to be
This is precisely the ground I cover in my book,swept along by those winds, as they sow spring fields
"Democrats in the Red Zone: an Independent voter'swith the seeds of positive change - or whether they
take on the game of political perception." I gave a copywill stick with what they think they know, even if it
to Obama's communications team in New Hampshire,leads to failure.