Science Envy

Many management theorists yearn to be scientific andterm) choices? So even if I do associate black with
as a consequence the domain is littered with toolsunpleasant would that necessarily translate into my not
which claim to have scientific validity and which go ongiving a black person a job? How are these tests valid
to claim the ability to measure, predict and controlwithout some kind of relation to people acting on their
many aspects of human and organisational life. So, forunconscious biases, and surely there must be some
example, you might choose to use Cameron andethical problems of pursuing this. In other words, I can
Quinn's Competing Values Framework which isunderstand how efforts can be made to make the
supposed to allow you to diagnose and change yourtest internally consistent, but in what way are they
organisation's culture and values. By using the toolsconsistent with the 'real world' they claim to represent?
managers can help employees line up and point in theHow would one 'prove' their predictability? Predictive of
same direction by adopting the values you require inwhat?
your organisation.Then of course there is the MyersThirdly, the tests conform to the behaviourist
Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) which is supposed toassumptions of cognitive psychology where attitude is
indicate which of the Jungian personality archetypesconsidered to be an individual construct which dictates
best describes your character.behaviour, and if identified can be changed. Attitude
Alternatively you might use an Implicit Association Testprecedes behaviour, rather than being understood the
(IAT) to diagnose unconscious bias in yourother way round, that because I have behaved in a
employees.The IAT is usually administered as aparticular way over many, many occasions, so this has
computer-based test where respondents are asked toformed my attitude.There is also the rationalist
make associations between words. The idea seemscausality behind the idea of 'surfacing your mental
to be that when faced with a choice between twomodels' in order to change them: the implicit assumption
word pairings, black/white, pleasant/unpleasant,here is that it is possible to make the unconscious
hesitation in associating say, black with pleasant isconscious, and by doing do change first one's attititude,
taken to indicate unconscious bias against blackthen one's behaviour.
people. This is also related to the speed with whichAdditionally, my attitude, a tendency to act in a
one associates white with pleasant. It is a test basedparticular way, will have been formed in different social
on manual dexterity, measuring speed of response insettings. It may be that I am racist but sit with an
typing. Despite the enormous amount of energy andinterview panel who are not: as this becomes obvious
resources put into replicating and validating these tests,to me it becomes extremely difficult to express my
they are deeply problematic.racial bias in public. The opposite is also true if I am not
Firstly, in the test I took it was not possible to associateracist, but the other people I interview with are - so I
both white and black with pleasant in the samemay feel constrained in saying what I really think. And
iteration: one is always obliged to choose betweenon what basis do I can I assume that the people I am
them. One could be forgiven for thinking that the test isinterviewing with are unconsciously biased unless they
creating the conditions it claims to be testing for.explicitly give this as a reason for not appointing a
Secondly, in what way do word association testsblack candidate? The test takes no account of the
actually correlate with real-world (if you forgive thesocial nature of prejudice.